|
1. Biologie
|
|
|
|
The Mystery of How Cancer Cells Barrel Through Your Body [Wired]
|
|
|
|
|
|
From
a practical point of view, all the theory papers in the world won’t
make a difference if physicists cannot get biologists and clinicians
interested in their ideas. Jamming is a hot topic in physics, but most
biologists have not yet heard of it, Fredberg said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 Dép., diag. & prono. - Sein
|
|
|
|
5. Traitements
|
|
|
Important advance made with new approach to “control” cancer, not eliminate it [OSU]
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
approach, called a “metronomic dosage regimen,” uses significantly
lower doses of chemotherapeutic drugs but at more frequent time
intervals. This would have multiple goals of killing cancer cells,
creating a hostile biological environment for their growth, reducing
toxicity from the drug regimen and avoiding the development of
resistance to the cancer drugs being used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.10 Traitements - Essais
|
|
|
|
5.3 Traitements - FDA, EMA,...
|
|
|
|
5.4 Traitements - Economie
|
|
|
|
6. Lutte contre les cancers
|
|
|
Rise of the super-sized genome projects [PHG Foundation]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most
recently, the European Alliance for Personalized Medicine (EAPM) has
called for a new project to link sequencing efforts across EU member
states in a similar manner to the Genome Asia 100K, but to create a
shared database of a million genomes from European populations for
clinical research.
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 Observation
|
|
|
Hodgkin survivors face risk of serious heart problems [Reuters]
|
|
|
|
|
|
To
assess the lasting effects of treatment on heart health, Bhakta and
colleagues examined data on about 350 adults who survived at least a
decade after their Hodgkin diagnosis, as well as about 270 people
without a cancer history who were similar in gender and age.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.11 Patients
|
|
|
|
6.6 Publications
|
|
|
We should reward peer reviewers. But how? [STAT]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elsevier,
which publishes some 3,200 journals, is now piloting a way for
reviewers to get props from their peers and editors. The plan, according
to a note sent to reviewers, is to “publish on the journal’s website a
list of reviewers with their full names and their relative ranking and
percentile in how quickly they submitted their report (computed as days
between the invitation to review and the submission of a referee
report).”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7.2 Applis
|
|
|