|
3.1 Tabac
|
|
|
|
3.1.1 Tabac - e-cigs
|
|
|
|
5.3 Traitements - FDA, EMA,...
|
|
|
|
5.9.3 EHA
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Lutte contre les cancers
|
|
|
|
Four key ways to improve cancer patient care in Wales [Cancer Research UK]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday
we published our report, Where next for cancer services in Wales?,
looking in detail at the challenges the nation faces. While there have
been notable improvements in cancer care in Wales, with more people
surviving than ever before, things are still a long way from where they
should be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cancer drugs in your bathroom cabinet [The Guardian]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Despite
promising results like these, it could still be years before we know
for sure if repurposed drugs work against cancer, and if so, how best to
use them. But unfortunately, time is a luxury many cancer patients
can’t afford. This has prompted some to take matters into their own
hands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.11 Patients
|
|
|
|
|
6.5 Médecines alternatives
|
|
|
|
6.6 Publications
|
|
|
Crap, Courtesy of a Major Scientific Publisher [In the Pipeline]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scientific
Reports is a catch-all journal, for sure, the Nature Publishing Group’s
answer to PLOS ONE. In theory, it’s not supposed to review for impact
in any way, just for scientific accuracy. Once that’s established, the
authors pay the fee and the paper gets published, and the whole thing is
open-access. I don’t have a problem with that model. But it doesn’t
work if you don’t review the damned papers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 DMP, Big Data & applis
|
|
|
|
6.8 Communication
|
|
|